Rflct

How a financial services firm linked brand strength to customer flows

By measuring the brand across three layers — function, credibility and image — and connecting results to actual customer flows, the firm could see where the brand actually drove business and where it only drove awareness.

A Nordic financial services firm perceived their brand as strong — high awareness scores, good placement in traditional brand indices, and positive attitudes in customer surveys. Despite this, the customer base was not growing at the expected rate.

Reflect conducted a brand study that went beyond traditional measurements. Instead of measuring the brand on a single dimension, we used a three-layer model: functional attributes (products, terms, accessibility), credibility attributes (expertise, transparency, stability) and image attributes (modernity, innovation, values).

The analysis revealed a gap: the brand was strong on image and awareness, but weaker on the functional attributes that actually drove choice of financial partner. Competitors had lower overall brand awareness but stronger connection between brand and the attributes that drove active switching of engagement.

The decisive insight came when brand data was connected to actual customer flows. The driver analysis showed that the attributes the firm communicated most — innovation and modernity — had minimal impact on conversion. The attributes that actually drove switching — personal advisory and transparency in terms — were barely communicated at all.

Results were delivered as a prioritization matrix showing the ROI potential of shifting communication focus, with estimated effects per segment and channel.

Key takeaways

  • High awareness is not the same as brand strength that drives business
  • Three-layer model revealed gap between image and functional drivers
  • Communication focus did not match the attributes that drove conversion
  • Customer flow linkage showed where the brand actually influenced choice

Related articles

What is brand strength?

Brand strength is a measure of how much a brand influences future demand and price level. It is not about how many people know the brand, but how much the brand actually drives purchase decisions and willingness to pay.

Why NPS rarely leads to better decisions

NPS (Net Promoter Score) measures recommendation intent, not actual loyalty. The link between what customers say they would recommend and what they actually do is weak. NPS gives a number, but rarely an actionable insight.

Attitude vs behavior

Attitude data (what customers say) and behavioral data (what customers do) often do not match. Surveys that only measure attitudes risk giving a skewed picture of reality. The key to reliable insights is combining both.

How to measure brands properly

Measuring brand properly means connecting brand perception to actual purchase behavior. It requires a combination of attitude measurement, behavioral data and economic outcome metrics, not just awareness and preference.

Why brands must be understood through category

What brand means varies dramatically between categories. In low-involvement categories, brand is about recognition and habit. In high-involvement categories, it is about trust and risk reduction. The same measurement method cannot be applied across the board.

Function, credibility, image

Brands create value through three layers: functional (the product delivers), credibility (I trust the brand), and image (the brand says something about me). Which dimension drives premium depends on the category.

Hygiene factors vs motivators

Not all brand attributes are equal. Hygiene factors create dissatisfaction when absent but no extra value when present. Motivators create real differentiation. Telling them apart is crucial for where you invest.

How brands create premium

Premium is not just a higher price. It is forgiveness: tolerance for mistakes, loyalty through price increases, and room to innovate. Strong brands buy strategic flexibility.

Exclusivity and polarization

Strong brands often win by being exclusive, not universal. Polarization, where some people dislike you, can be a strength rather than a weakness.

Segmentation in brand strategy

Segmentation should drive brand strategy, not just communication planning. Without segmentation you do not know which consumers your brand actually resonates with, and which you should stop chasing.

Reflect brand framework

Our framework measures brand through behavioral connection, not just attitude. We connect brand perception to actual behavior: purchase, loyalty, premium. That gives insights which drive business results.

See related service
Back to Why brand must be understood through category